| Subject: RE: Gemulator, WinSTon, and PaCifiST |
Author: Nick Bales (antero.stortek.com)
Date: 12-02-1999 07:26
WinSTon and PaCifiST were designed for games, but for anything serious, they are both pretty bad. PaCifiST's keyboard routines are crap. Have you ever tried typing even a small text with it ?
Besides, neither of these can emulate higher res modes. Gemulator and TosBox, with TOS 2.06, can both go up to the PC's high res modes. I use Gemulator with NVDI and the Thing desktop, and a quick Gembench shows it to run at 10 times my Falcon030's speed, and about 4 times the speed of a TT. This is on a K6-2/366.
|
| Topics |
Author |
Date |
 any future for Atari ? new |
BLC |
11-28-1999 16:58 |
  Future, yes. Near future, no new |
Torbjörn J. |
11-28-1999 17:55 |
| RE: any future for Atari ? new |
Nick Bales |
11-29-1999 04:06 |
 RE: any future for Atari ? new |
Elliot |
11-29-1999 04:26 |
 RE: any future for Atari ? new |
Dan |
12-04-1999 17:01 |
| RE: any future for Atari ? new |
BLC |
11-29-1999 17:39 |
| RE: any future for Atari ? new |
Nick Bales |
11-30-1999 08:36 |
 Gemulator, WinSTon, and PaCifiST new |
BLC |
11-30-1999 09:27 |
| RE: Gemulator, WinSTon, and PaCifiST new |
Elliot |
11-30-1999 10:39 |
| RE: Gemulator, WinSTon, and PaCifiST |
Nick Bales |
12-02-1999 07:26 |
| RE: Gemulator, WinSTon, and PaCifiST new |
Nick Bales |
12-02-1999 07:21 |
| RE: any future for Atari ? new |
BLC |
11-29-1999 17:40 |
| RE: any future for Atari ? new |
Anthony Green |
11-30-1999 00:03 |
 |
|
|
