Atari.Org
Click Here
HomeNewsServicesForumsSupport

Talk Atari

Atari.Org Forums


16/32-Bit

8-Bits

Classics

Emulation

Jaguar

Lynx

Classic Consoles Forum 8-Bits Forum 16/32 Forum
Emulation Forum Jaguar Forum Lynx Forum
 
 Subject: RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? )
Author: Peter (smtp.hms.se)
Date:   09-06-2007 15:38

It's important to note the mint kernel in itself is far from inefficient. While a fullblown EasyMiNT/XaAES setup sure needs more memory than MagiC, it's not slower by nature.

The MultiTOS AES should be compared with a "naked" TOS/GEM - both written by Atari - both dead slow in most non-monochrome resolutions. Install a faster AES and a fast VDI, and the problem goes away.

FreeMiNT is a direct descendant of the OS Atari choose before they left us, and compared to MagiC it has a far better internal architecture, real unix compatibility, real device drivers, easy portability, and - above all - it works as Atari once intended. Using it is effectively the same as supporting it, giving coders a reason to code for it and develop the kernel/AES further.

Oh, and it's free too.

-- Peter

 Topics Author  Date
  CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-29-2007 01:33 
   RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-29-2007 04:04 
    RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-29-2007 09:42 
     RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-29-2007 22:53 
      RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new The Paranoid 08-29-2007 23:33 
       RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Anders Eriksson 08-30-2007 17:41 
        RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new The Paranoid 08-30-2007 22:18 
      RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-30-2007 11:39 
       RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 12:51 
        RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-30-2007 13:19 
         RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 22:37 
          RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-31-2007 11:43 
           RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-31-2007 20:59 
            RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new The Paranoid 08-31-2007 21:57 
             RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 09-01-2007 02:59 
    RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-29-2007 09:44 
     RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-29-2007 22:54 
   RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-29-2007 09:34 
    RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-29-2007 23:01 
     RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Miro Kropacek 08-30-2007 11:04 
      RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 12:58 
     RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-30-2007 11:41 
      RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 13:04 
       RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-30-2007 13:22 
        RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 20:34 
         RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 08-30-2007 21:31 
          RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 09-01-2007 03:05 
           RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Peter 09-02-2007 12:27 
            RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 09-03-2007 06:18 
           RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new jens 09-05-2007 10:17 
           RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? )  Peter 09-06-2007 15:38 
       RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Miro Kropacek 08-30-2007 21:29 
        RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 22:48 
         RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Miro Kropacek 08-31-2007 11:09 
          RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-31-2007 21:05 
   RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new Anders Eriksson 08-30-2007 17:38 
    RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new ToasT 08-30-2007 21:26 
    RE: CT63 = CT60 ? ( EH? ) new FatRakoon 08-30-2007 22:03 

 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:
 Your Email:
 Subject:
 Human verification:   What's this?
               _    __     _ _     
 _ __  ___ _ _| |_ / _|___| (_)___ 
| '_ \/ _ \ '_|  _|  _/ _ \ | / _ \
| .__/\___/_|  \__|_| \___/_|_\___/
|_|                                
    



Copyright © 1997-2024 Atari.Org 
Atari is registered trademark of Infogrames