Atari.Org
Click Here
HomeNewsServicesForumsSupport

Talk Atari

Atari.Org Forums


16/32-Bit

8-Bits

Classics

Emulation

Jaguar

Lynx

Classic Consoles Forum 8-Bits Forum 16/32 Forum
Emulation Forum Jaguar Forum Lynx Forum
 
 Subject: RE: Why?
Author: Shalroth (webcachem04b.cache.pol.co.uk)
Date:   11-08-2001 23:55

Never liked Sisko, he was too Politically Correct for my liking.

Of course I knew what the T stood for (it was in ST:TUC, but I knew waaaay before then)...I'll bet you never knew that NCC (like, NCC-74656 or NCC-1701) stands for Naval Construction Contract? And NX, like NX-2000 for the USS Excelsior and NX-01 for the USS Enterprise (in the new show, there are others too) stands for Naval eXperiment? Now you do!!

Bones was cool, I always liked 'I'm a Doctor, not a brick layer' in "The Devil in the Dark", I always found that funny. Then he was up to his elbows in plaster of paris...

Best line of SG1 so far was in last night's episode...

Aschen: You look Pensive, Colonel?
O'Neill: I was just...thinking...

And later...

O'Neill: That's O'Neill. [holds up three fingers] Two "L"s.

and...

Teal'C and Daniel run out of a collapsing, ruined building. They stop.
Teal'C: Did I not warn you that might happen Daniel Jackson?


God I love Teal'C...and Jack...but not in a sex way. That's when I love Sam Carter and Doc Fraiser...but that's off topic...

 Topics Author  Date
  Why? new The Redeemer 11-07-2001 11:54 
   RE: Why? new Anders Eriksson 11-07-2001 12:31 
   RE: Why? new scott 11-07-2001 13:04 
    RE: Why? new The Redeemer 11-08-2001 11:55 
     RE: Why? new scott 11-09-2001 09:12 
   RE: Why? new MikeyB 11-07-2001 13:51 
    RE: Why? new Shane 11-07-2001 14:53 
     RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-07-2001 20:15 
      RE: Why? new Jan Thomas 11-07-2001 20:19 
      RE: Why? new shalroth 11-08-2001 11:55 
       RE: Why? new The Redeemer 11-08-2001 12:04 
        RE: Why?  Shalroth 11-08-2001 23:55 
      RE: Why? new The Redeemer 11-08-2001 12:01 
       RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-08-2001 19:52 
   RE: Why? new ggn 11-07-2001 14:51 
    RE: Why? new Jan Thomas 11-07-2001 15:04 
    RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-07-2001 20:18 
     RE: Why? new scott 11-08-2001 10:01 
      RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-08-2001 19:54 
       RE: Why? new scott 11-09-2001 09:17 
   RE: Why? new Joshua Kaijankoski 11-07-2001 15:10 
    RE: Why? new The Redeemer 11-08-2001 12:08 
     RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-08-2001 19:55 
   RE: Why?... WHO! new TC_Steve 11-07-2001 15:25 
    RE: Why?... WHO! new scott 11-08-2001 10:06 
     RE: Why?... WHO! new shalroth 11-08-2001 12:06 
      RE: Why?... WHO! new Fat Rakoon 11-08-2001 20:04 
       RE: Why?... WHO! new Shalroth 11-08-2001 23:57 
        RE: Why?... WHO! new Fat Rakoon 11-09-2001 03:02 
         RE: Why?... WHO! new shalroth 11-09-2001 15:30 
       RE: Why?... WHO! new scott 11-09-2001 09:22 
    RE: Why?... WHO! new shalroth 11-08-2001 11:59 
   RE: Why? new gabberkid 11-07-2001 15:50 
   RE: Why? new Mill 11-07-2001 18:57 
    Quite So! new The Redeemer 11-08-2001 12:12 
    RE: Why? new Fat Rakoon 11-08-2001 20:06 
     RE: Why? new Gingerwilly17 11-10-2001 00:10 

 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:
 Your Email:
 Subject:
 Human verification:   What's this?
               _    __     _ _     
 _ __  ___ _ _| |_ / _|___| (_)___ 
| '_ \/ _ \ '_|  _|  _/ _ \ | / _ \
| .__/\___/_|  \__|_| \___/_|_\___/
|_|                                
    



Copyright © 1997-2024 Atari.Org 
Atari is registered trademark of Infogrames