Atari.Org
Click Here
HomeNewsServicesForumsSupport

Talk Atari

Atari.Org Forums


16/32-Bit

8-Bits

Classics

Emulation

Jaguar

Lynx

Classic Consoles Forum 8-Bits Forum 16/32 Forum
Emulation Forum Jaguar Forum Lynx Forum
 
 Subject: RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S?
Author: Jo Even (213-187-172-45.dd.nextgentel.com)
Date:   01-24-2002 01:00

FatRakoon wrote:
> NVDI is only marginally faster than
> standard Magic on your Stacy???

Yes. The only thing that's faster with NVDI is text output. MagiC's VDI is still way faster than Atari's.

> now ) Maybe its because the Stacy being
> the laptop style, and has very slow
> display anyway??

No, since benchmarks only measure the time it takes to perform the operation, the result is the same as in ST High.

> My previous stuff with MiNT - You are
> offering help???

Yes, I did. Just mail me your configuration-files (mint.cnf, n_aes.cnf) and an unsorted list of your autofolder (how it looks under MiNT ofcourse), and I'll try to help you out. Oh, some info on your hardware would help too.

> KOBOLD
> No, I am not saying to make a full
> filesystem, thats not what I mean, I just
> mean that having the basic
> COPY/MOVE/DELETE stuff would surely make

The problem is that TOS doesn't *have* any functions for copying or moving (*) files, so no programs would be able to use this...

(* From TOS 1.04 and upwards, Frename can rename the complete path, and not just the filename. So Frename can actually move files within partitions. This is the same thing as Kobold does.)

> at least surely there must be some better
> way to get a faster Disk access?

It would be very hard to do it any faster and more reliable than MiNT and MagiC does it today. Both push the hardware to the limit, atleast on my TT.

> I simply meant that rather than the O/S
> being written in C, what if it was re-done
> in Assem, with the bugs fixed, then it
> would be faster,

It could be faster, but not any faster than MagiC or MiNT is today. There is little advantage in writing everything in assembler, that's why large parts of both MagiC and NVDI is written in C. Hand-optimized assembler can make a difference in small, tight loops, but generally speaking it's not worth the time and effort when it comes to a project like a complete OS. The OS doesn't do much anyway, atleast not ours.

I'd suggest that you burn a stable version of MagiC in ROMs, and try that out. It's a very good solution for ST's, atleast if you fit a TOS-switch.

 Topics Author  Date
  Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-22-2002 19:56 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Joshua Kaijankoski 01-22-2002 20:52 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 00:51 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Elliot 01-22-2002 20:59 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 00:47 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new mark 01-23-2002 08:12 
      RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new ade 01-28-2002 19:26 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-23-2002 12:01 
      RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 22:34 
       RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-24-2002 22:26 
        RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-25-2002 06:59 
         RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-25-2002 11:01 
          RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-26-2002 03:08 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-23-2002 00:42 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 01:03 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-23-2002 11:57 
      RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 22:50 
       RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S?  Jo Even 01-24-2002 01:00 
        RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 01:29 
        RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Elliot 01-24-2002 13:46 
         RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-24-2002 16:47 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new The Paranoid 01-23-2002 10:19 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 23:22 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new daniel 01-24-2002 00:53 
      RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 01:41 
       RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Elliot 01-24-2002 14:11 
   Yet another one? new Alex F. 01-23-2002 14:29 
    RE: Yet another one? new Scott 01-23-2002 15:23 
     RE: Yet another one? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 23:44 
    RE: Yet another one? new Rob 01-24-2002 05:20 
     RE: Yet another one? new Alex F. 01-24-2002 07:33 
      RE: Yet another one? new Elliot 01-24-2002 14:16 
       DSP - Detects Slow Programmers :-) new Alex F. 01-24-2002 19:37 
        RE: DSP - Detects Slow Programmers :-) new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 20:26 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Scott 01-23-2002 15:02 
    On MagiC new Alex F. 01-23-2002 15:37 
     RE: On MagiC new Scott 01-24-2002 10:30 
      RE: On MagiC new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 20:31 
     RE: On MagiC new stimpy 01-29-2002 23:01 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-23-2002 23:39 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Jo Even 01-24-2002 01:10 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 04:26 
    RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new Daniel Gustafsson 01-24-2002 11:55 
     RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-24-2002 20:39 
   RE: Is It about time we had a new O/S? new FatRakoon 01-26-2002 13:50 

 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:
 Your Email:
 Subject:
 Human verification:   What's this?
               _    __     _ _     
 _ __  ___ _ _| |_ / _|___| (_)___ 
| '_ \/ _ \ '_|  _|  _/ _ \ | / _ \
| .__/\___/_|  \__|_| \___/_|_\___/
|_|                                
    



Copyright © 1997-2024 Atari.Org 
Atari is registered trademark of Infogrames