Atari.Org
Click Here
HomeNewsServicesForumsSupport

Talk Atari

Atari.Org Forums


16/32-Bit

8-Bits

Classics

Emulation

Jaguar

Lynx

Classic Consoles Forum 8-Bits Forum 16/32 Forum
Emulation Forum Jaguar Forum Lynx Forum
 
 Subject: RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4
Author: Miro Kropacek (gw-ba4-4.mcrn.sk)
Date:   08-15-2008 10:59

These bus errors may have also another causes -- the most obvious is low stack size (use something like stack --fix=512k for gcc/cc1 etc binaries -- look for example stack sizes in gcc2's binaries), or low TPA in freemint (it can be set in mint.cnf file) or unreliable memory (yes, freemint is much more sensitive for memory defects than TOS)

Good test case is to use this gcc4 compilation in aranym -- here you can eliminate the possibility of bad hardware and focus on other causes.

For example, if you would read the mintlist in that time, you would see how hard it was to compile the first gcc/g++4 binary, just because of mentioned errors.

 Topics Author  Date
  gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Knez 08-06-2008 23:58 
   RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Miro Kropacek 08-07-2008 10:56 
    RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Knez 08-07-2008 11:22 
    RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Patrice Mandin 08-09-2008 22:53 
     RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new PeterS 08-12-2008 14:43 
      RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Patrice Mandin 08-14-2008 19:15 
       RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4 new Knez 08-14-2008 19:56 
        RE: gcc 2 vs 3 & 4  Miro Kropacek 08-15-2008 10:59 

 Reply To This Message
 Your Name:
 Your Email:
 Subject:
 Human verification:   What's this?
               _    __     _ _     
 _ __  ___ _ _| |_ / _|___| (_)___ 
| '_ \/ _ \ '_|  _|  _/ _ \ | / _ \
| .__/\___/_|  \__|_| \___/_|_\___/
|_|                                
    



Copyright © 1997-2024 Atari.Org 
Atari is registered trademark of Infogrames